Skip to main content

How surprising was the betrayal?

Part 2 was surprising, but at the same time, I think we should have expected some sort of betrayal coming. I don't know if it's just me, but I felt very anxious every time Julia and Winston met up. The suspense and tension building throughout this book had to have a big reveal exploding. Did you guys see this coming? What about O'Brien's involvement behind all of this?

These 2 chapters in Part 3 are really mentally and physically draining to read. Here, we see the full extent of torture and abuse that the Party is capable of. There are people who beg to be killed rather than taken into specific rooms. I thought it was also horrifying how a daughter reported her father of thoughtcrime while he was asleep?? This just goes to show how the horror of the Party is truly impossible to escape from -- exactly why Julia and Winston couldn't keep their secrets for long either.

Although I was slightly surprised that Winston and Julia were caught, I had no idea O'Brien would have completely fooled them. I realized that this is the reason why people fear the Party and why no one really makes it out of the torture mentally sane.

Comments

  1. To be honest, I think you would have to be completely naïve to not see the betrayal coming. I think that we would all wish the best for our protagonist, but reason takes over. Winston was not careful and went head first into a situation that was going to end up horribly for him regardless of the results.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think we all knew Winston was doomed. After all, Julia figured him out immediately, so there's no reason to think Big Brother wouldn't. There's still the question of what ultimately happens to Winston...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I honestly feel no sympathy for Winston. The chapters were uncomfortable to read, but more because I was trying to make sense of the ideology O'Brien is setting forth. I can't say that I saw the betrayal coming, but it was a complete plot twist. This book is so convoluted in it's own timeline that making sense of what is the "truth" isn't quite feasible. This was totally Orwell's intention, and I feel that none of us will be able to logically make sense of the book.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think I definitely had an idea of what was coming, but I definitely didn't think Mr. Carrington to be part of the Thought Police. That must have meant that Winston was flagged from the moment he entered that store to buy the diary. That's what's surprising to me. It did still catch me off guard even if I knew that was the natural plot of the path. I was just waiting for the other shoe to drop, and for me, it was the opposite. Every time they met up and didn't get caught instilled a little bit of confidence in me that they were getting better and better and even more careful.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I definitely agree with your description of what it felt like to read these passages in terms of the physical reaction to sympathy regarding someone being tortured. Fear is definitely a manipulation tactic used throughout the novel.

    ReplyDelete
  6. For me the real problem about the father who got reported was that the father was fine with it. In fact he was proud of his daughter for having turned him in for something he had basically no control over. O'Brien too had always been a little suspicious to me, but it was a huge surprise to me that Mr. Carrington had been thought police. My only other question is if O'Brien really told the truth about Julia's betrayal.

    ReplyDelete
  7. While I didn't think O'Brien and Mr. Charrington were working for the government, it was clear that Winston and Julia were going to get caught. Sure, they lived in a room with no monitoring, but that makes it even more likely that they would be watched, because whoever lived in that room would be suspicious. But seeing O'Brien and Mr. Charrington as Thought Police definitely showed how omnipresent the government is.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I honestly kind of expected this betrayal, and I initially thought that O'Brien would be the one betraying Winston too. But I completely agree with your point, the way Orwell writes the betrayal and all of the events leading up to it still made me completely shocked when it finally happened.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The spectrum of promiscuity

In Brave New World, we see people pressured and conditioned into being very open about their sexuality and erotic behaviors. Monogamy is looked down upon and one is viewed unfavorably if they stick to a sexual partner (how people looked at Lenina). I thought it was really interesting how in 1984, the opposite idea spread throughout the party and its followers. Winston’s thoughts about desiring sex was seen as rebellious and something that no one in the party thought about (although there were people who had secret encounters with prole prostitutes). What do you guys think about the drastic differences in how each book portrays sexuality and promiscuity? Does the society in brave new world model our current societal views on sex? Or is our culture more similar to 1984? I think that in the US -- especially in the current younger generation --, the concept of dating and sex is not as “improper” as before. We often see this modelled in social media, tv shows...

Conquering Winston's MIND

I find these chapters of 1984 so depressing, not only because of the physical torture itself but because O'Brien used Winston's fear  to take over Winston's mind. Throughout the weeks of O'Brien torturing Winston, I was surprised to see Winston fight back at some moments. Even after getting shocked dozens of times, starved, brutally beaten up, "supposedly" betrayed by Julia, his emotions and inner heart had stayed true to what he believed. I admired how he refused to let go of reality, love, and how he refused to betray Julia. Therefore, I find it somewhat ironic and depressing that Winston gave up this inner heart and will to survive because of his fear of rats. He survived through other horrible things, but in the end, he couldn't overcome his mind.  (Start video @ 1 min)   I completely understand Winston -- I hate rats as well, especially if they eat your face--, but I feel like Orwell purposely chose a personal attack on Winston. This ...

Conditioned or manufactured?

While starting 1984, I noticed an interesting difference between Brave New World and this book. In Brave New World, it was known to readers that people were "manufactured" and designed in a specific way that forced an individual to follow a certain path. For example, some people were born as alphas while others were born as gammas or deltas. As people were born into this world they were instantly met with expectations, designated jobs, etc. It was interesting to me that Winston wasn’t born into a specific role in society and that no one was really “above” someone else or inferior to others (except for the proles). Despite how brave new world’s environment and 1984 differed, both stories have people pushing strong beliefs onto everybody else. If you were to be a character in this story, would you rather be in brave new world (where you are manufactured and designed to live a certain life) or be in 1984 (where you are heavily conditioned to live a certain ...